This post was originally published on October 15th, 2024, and updated on May 19th, 2025.
Debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing refers to a specialized form of funding that allows companies undergoing Chapter 11 bankruptcy to access capital during the restructuring process. This financing is not just a source of liquidity — it serves as a mechanism to keep operations running, sustain employee wages, and maintain supplier relationships. At the same time, a reorganization plan is being developed and executed.
Unlike standard loans, debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing receives priority over previous debt obligations, equity claims, and other liabilities, placing the lender in a favorable position in the bankruptcy hierarchy. Because this financing is extended after the bankruptcy filing, it is governed closely by the court and subject to approval before funds are disbursed.
Debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing structures vary depending on a company’s capital needs, creditor composition, and the complexity of its restructuring. The choice of structure impacts lender risk and borrower flexibility.
New money arrangements introduce fresh capital into the business and are usually funded by third-party lenders or existing stakeholders seeking to preserve asset value. This type is the most direct form of debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing and is typically used to cover payroll, vendor payments, and other operational costs.
A roll-up structure consolidates prepetition debt into the postpetition facility, prioritizing existing obligations DIP. While this can incentivize lender participation, it often faces scrutiny from the court and creditors who see the elevation of old debt as unfavorable to other stakeholders.
In cases where existing lenders are unwilling to subordinate or renegotiate, a debtor may seek a priming DIP loan, which grants a new lender a superior lien position. To approve this, the court must determine that the debtor cannot obtain financing otherwise and that the interests of current lienholders are adequately protected.
A revolving credit facility offers the debtor flexibility by allowing drawdowns as needed rather than providing a lump sum. This approach is common in businesses with fluctuating working capital demands, such as retail and seasonal operations.
Debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing supports a company’s short-term survival and long-term restructuring goals. It helps stabilize operations while also shaping the power dynamics among stakeholders.
The financing ensures that companies do not immediately cease operations following a voluntary bankruptcy filing. This continuity preserves enterprise value and creates a path to reorganization rather than liquidation, which can result in steeper losses for all parties involved.
Suppliers, employees, customers, and even regulators see debtor-in-possession approval as a signal that the company has a functioning recovery plan and financial backing. This perception helps retain partnerships and business confidence throughout the Chapter 11 case.
By preserving the business as a going concern, debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing increases the likelihood of higher recoveries for creditors. Reorganized operations or asset sales conducted under less pressure generally result in more favorable outcomes than distressed liquidation.
Because debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing alters traditional lender rights and creditor hierarchy, it is tightly regulated under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Judicial oversight ensures that all stakeholders are treated fairly during the process.
Court approval is mandatory before the financing agreement becomes enforceable. The judge evaluates whether the terms are justified, the financing is necessary, and the estate will benefit. Hearings allow interested parties to support or contest the arrangement.
DIP loans generally receive “super-priority” status under Section 364(c) or 364(d) of the Bankruptcy Code. This status means the lender gets repaid ahead of most other obligations, including previous secured debt, subject to specific court conditions.
A formal motion must be filed disclosing the complete details of the financing — interest rates, fees, maturity dates, covenants, and collateral. The company must also prove that alternative funding on better terms is unavailable. Full transparency is required to avoid disadvantaging unsecured creditors or equity holders.
Debtor-in-Possession (DIP) financing gives companies time and room to execute a recovery plan without the constant threat of shutdown. It realigns the business around a survival framework while enabling operational flexibility.
Bankrupt companies often face an acute cash crunch. Debtor-in-Possession (DIP) financing bridges this gap, enabling companies to meet daily operational costs and avoid immediate asset liquidation.
Access to court-approved capital empowers management to renegotiate contracts, leases, and supplier agreements. The financing demonstrates backing from institutional or private lenders, improving the company’s negotiation leverage.
DIP capital acts as a transitional mechanism toward exit financing or sale transactions. It gives the debtor the time and operational consistency to pursue favorable refinancing or asset monetization strategies.
Lenders participating in debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing gain enhanced priority but also assume heightened legal and commercial risk. Each agreement must be carefully structured to balance returns with protections.
Judicial discretion can lead to changes in the final financing terms. Courts may reject specific clauses, alter fee structures, or impose limits on repayment provisions, which impact the lender’s return profile.
In many bankruptcy cases, the debtor’s assets are already pledged. If the DIP loan does not receive priming lien approval, collateral coverage may be minimal. This risk requires careful diligence on asset valuations and competing claims.
Even with financing in place, some restructurings fail. A shift from reorganization to liquidation can reduce lender recoveries, particularly if asset sales fall short or court-administered expenses absorb available proceeds.
The debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing landscape adapts to broader economic and market forces. Shifting lender preferences, legal precedents, and macroeconomic stress factors shape the structure and cost of DIP facilities.
Private equity and credit funds increasingly dominate the DIP market, offering custom solutions outside traditional banking structures. These lenders bring speed and flexibility, which are particularly valuable in time-sensitive restructurings.
Companies tend to require larger DIP loans in recessionary cycles due to extended operating losses or supply chain challenges. Lenders typically respond by tightening loan covenants and reducing drawdown flexibility.
Modern DIP structures often include deadlines for reorganization plan filing, asset marketing, or case resolution. These milestones provide accountability and allow lenders to terminate or renegotiate if objectives are unmet.
DISCLAIMER: Acquire.Fi is the listing and advertising platform for Web3 businesses and does not certify or verify the information provided to the platform by the business owners. Acquire.FI LTD (Acquire.Fi) does not hold itself out as providing any legal, financial or other advice. Acquire.Fi also does not make any recommendation or endorsement as to any investment, advisor or other service or product or to any material submitted by third parties to Acquire.Fi. Acquire.Fi is not a licensed crypto asset service provider for the purpose of EU regulation. The following list is compiled from Acquire Fi partners. Acquire fi is not a licensed crypto asset service provider for the purpose of EU regulation.
Have queries? Reach out to us on the email below!
team@acquire.fi
.webp)