A tenbagger is a stock that has returned ten times the original purchase price, generating a 900% gain. The term was coined by Peter Lynch, the legendary Fidelity Magellan Fund manager who ran the fund from 1977 to 1990, in his 1989 book One Up on Wall Street. Lynch used the baseball analogy of a ten-base hit, impossible in the real game but his metaphor for an investment that delivers exceptional returns. Lynch found his tenbaggers by investing in companies early in their growth trajectory, often before Wall Street paid attention to them.
Think of a tenbagger as the stock equivalent of buying a small coffee shop before it becomes a national chain: the growth was always in the business, but you had to recognize it before the crowd did.
Tenbaggers do not happen randomly. They typically share a set of characteristics that allow revenues and profits to compound over years or decades at above-average rates.
Lynch advocated for individual investors to invest in what they know and observe. A consumer who noticed Dunkin' Donuts expanding rapidly in the 1980s before Wall Street tracked it had an early information edge. He found tenbaggers in clothing retailers, restaurant chains, and consumer brands by observing real-world trends before they appeared in quarterly earnings reports that analysts studied.
His key screening criteria included low price-to-earnings ratios relative to growth rates (the PEG ratio), companies buying back their own shares, and businesses with boring, defensive names that institutions ignored because they were too small or unsexy to justify institutional research coverage.
The mathematics of a tenbagger require holding a stock through inevitable periods of significant decline. Most stocks that eventually become tenbaggers experience one or more drawdowns of 30% to 50% along the way. An investor who bought Netflix in January 2010 at approximately $9 per share and held through the 77% collapse in 2011 earned a 100x return by 2021. An investor who sold during the collapse to "cut losses" never recaptured that outcome.
Lynch acknowledged this directly: selling a stock because it has doubled is as irrational as selling a house because its value increased. If the underlying business is growing and the original thesis remains intact, price appreciation is a reason to review your position, not automatically a reason to exit.