Double-spending is when the same digital money is used in more than one transaction. In other words, someone tries to copy or reuse the same units twice to pay different people. The issue shows up with digital currency because data can be duplicated if a system does not check and lock each spend.
If double-spending succeeds, the recipient may think they have been paid when the network later rejects or reverses that payment. Trust in the system drops, and honest users take the loss. Blockchains were designed to stop this by making every spend public, ordered, and hard to change after the fact.
Attackers try to take advantage of the short window before a transaction is fully confirmed on the network.
Blockchains line up transactions in blocks, time-stamp them, and link each block to the previous one using cryptography. Once a transaction is buried under enough blocks, changing it becomes very costly. In proof-of-work systems, miners expend computing effort to add blocks, and the longest valid chain wins. In proof-of-stake systems, validators who misbehave can lose their stake. Both models aim to make rewriting the ledger expensive and rare.
Most wallets and merchants wait for network confirmations before treating a payment as final. This practice gives the network time to agree on a single history, which shuts down simple double-spend attempts that rely on timing. Many wallets help by warning users about unconfirmed transactions or blocking acceptance until confirmed.
The basic idea applies to any digital value system. If a platform tracks value with a database or ledger and does not coordinate updates properly, the same balance could be reused. Public blockchains solve this with open consensus, while centralized systems rely on a trusted server to check whether a token has already been spent.